Fuel Injected Electronics
Moderators: gregg dahl, Jayne
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
Do we have a decision ??? Time is running out . Some of us want to test before BG ...... let’s do this thing and get rolling !
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
with the advancing time. the simplest decision for this year.
wheel base 70 , with out clutch ,speed and wheel sensor.. and going to new rules for next year ??
wheel base 70 , with out clutch ,speed and wheel sensor.. and going to new rules for next year ??
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
The import guys have all of these sensors and they arent allowed traction/ wheelie control.
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
OK
Too much change may be a bad thing... But, it is become obvious that not enough Change, on time, has created a problem.
Data Gathering Only, was a Great concept. but is a bit outdated at this point..
Any sensor is an advantage .. obviously, and a bit longer wheelbase is another advantage..
Seems to me that allowing One advantage is the Obvious solution!!
I want ;
If Wheel-speed, clutch, type sensors are used... then stay at the Current 70 inch wheelbase.
No Change for some people...
Those who do Not embrace the Technology, and Do Not Utilize Wheel/clutch speed sensors either for Direct or Indirect feedback..
should be allowed a Slightly longer wheelbase.. We're Not talking a Foot here... 3 or 4 inches and lets go.
Remember that I originally wanted No Sensors...
I still like simply Riding the Bike... But it is way too late for that!!
Figuring on going in that Direction... next year we can check the Effects.... If Any!!
Fear Not, worst that can happen is we learn What really Works..
Sensors = no change... no sensors= a bit of Wheelbase..
Too much change may be a bad thing... But, it is become obvious that not enough Change, on time, has created a problem.
Data Gathering Only, was a Great concept. but is a bit outdated at this point..
Any sensor is an advantage .. obviously, and a bit longer wheelbase is another advantage..
Seems to me that allowing One advantage is the Obvious solution!!
I want ;
If Wheel-speed, clutch, type sensors are used... then stay at the Current 70 inch wheelbase.
No Change for some people...
Those who do Not embrace the Technology, and Do Not Utilize Wheel/clutch speed sensors either for Direct or Indirect feedback..
should be allowed a Slightly longer wheelbase.. We're Not talking a Foot here... 3 or 4 inches and lets go.
Remember that I originally wanted No Sensors...
I still like simply Riding the Bike... But it is way too late for that!!
Figuring on going in that Direction... next year we can check the Effects.... If Any!!
Fear Not, worst that can happen is we learn What really Works..
Sensors = no change... no sensors= a bit of Wheelbase..
Admin Notice
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:44 am
- Location: penn
- Contact:
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
Now I know what to do. Thanks Marty!
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
Ok, so what wheel base is the no sensor? 73 or 74?
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
hscharley wrote:Ok, so what wheel base is the no sensor? 73 or 74?
Let's go with a Design of 73" and an absolute of 74" which means not a Micrometer more!!
Designed at 3 should accomplish that easily...
Admin Notice
Re: Fuel Injected Electronics
Any chance of picking up a sponsor for this class?
Return to “Rule Change Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest